Method paperSep 2026
Four classifications for third party KPIs
Why key, supporting, prescriptive and detective is a more useful split than leading and lagging when the audience is a risk committee.
KPI working groupOpen
Short, dated and signed. Method papers accompany a toolkit release; notes respond to a regulatory change; commentary is a member’s argument, published because it is worth arguing with.
Why key, supporting, prescriptive and detective is a more useful split than leading and lagging when the audience is a risk committee.
A programme that cannot list its third parties cannot rate them. A sequence for the first ninety days.
The weighting behind the assessment tool, the objections raised in review, and what was changed.
An argument that assurance effort should follow substitutability rather than contract value.
Which fields most European programmes are missing, and the minimum set that closes the gap.
Why counting critical suppliers tells you very little about your actual exposure.
Members may propose a note of 800 to 2,000 words. Two reviewers, no fee, published under your name with a standing correction policy.